The Future of the Electric Vehicle Market: Challenges and Solutions

Tesla Cybertruck (photo from www.tesla.com)

Last week the world saw yet another one of Tesla’s creations, the Cybertruck. This electric pickup truck that looks like a prop from a futuristic science-fiction film can accelerate from 0 to 60 mph in 2.9 seconds and boasts a driving range of up to 500 miles. The Cybertruck can easily rival a conventional internal combustion engine (ICE) automobile in performance, however, with a price tag of $69,900 for such performance, it is far from being affordable to most people. Although the industry is putting out cheaper models every year, generally electric vehicles cost more than gasoline-powered cars. The long-standing issue of a limited driving range poses a significant barrier for potential consumers. Additionally, the current infrastructure is insufficient to provide for comfortable use of electric vehicles and to dispel consumer doubts. On the supply side of the market, manufacturers often face production issues when demand suddenly spikes and there is a shortage of materials. Given that the electric car manufacturers operate on thin profit margins these challenges, or rather the ability of the industry to overcome them, will shape the market over the next two decades. 

What is going on in the market today?

The electric vehicle industry is growing at an unprecedented rate. Last year, global EV sales were over 2 million units, a 63% jump from 2017. Out of 2 million units sold worldwide, China accounted for a lion’s share of sales. In the United States alone, the number of electric cars on roads has grown from barely a dozen thousand in 2011 to over 1.1 million cars in 2019 (reference figure 1 below). No doubt, electric cars are gaining increased popularity among drivers. Tesla Model 3 best showcases this trend as it became the best-selling electric car in the world in 2018 with 138,000 units sold, outselling its Chinese rivals BYD and BAIC as well as Nissan Leaf.

Figure 1

Tesla is still in the lead in terms of sales even surpassing the sales of luxury gasoline-powered car brands such as BMW in the United States. However, since Tesla unveiled its first electric car in 2008, other players have joined the race for EV dominance. Well-established automakers such as Volkswagen, BMW, GM, and Toyota are investing heavily in transitioning to electric vehicle production. Volkswagen is spending billions of dollars to reshape its factories for electric car production. The company has already revealed its first electric car model, ID. 3 1ST, which will start deliveries in 2020. It will offer free battery charging for a year and the vehicle will cost less than $45,000. Additionally, according to CNN Business, Volkswagen Group, which owns luxury car brands such as Porsche and Lamborghini, will spend $34 billion over the next half-decade to develop an electric or hybrid model of every car currently in production. Toyota claims 50% of its automobile sales will be electric in 2025 and plans to electrify all models by the same year. This year, BYD, a Chinese EV car brand that is barely mentioned in the west, began sales of its cheapest model, e1, starting at $8,950. Although the driving range is significantly lower than that of Tesla, the price provides an exceptional opportunity for the company to capture a sizable market share in China. According to Bloomberg, BYD Co. is now the largest producer of plug-in electric vehicles with monthly sales of 30,000 units in China. Favorable market conditions in China prompted the entry of startups as well. Premium EV startup, NIO, went public in the U.S. in 2018 and is already ramping up its production and deliveries in China. Multiple reports including Bloomberg predict Chinese EV makers will account for at least a third of the world’s production in a decade. 

The main driver of growth: incentives

Aware of the current state of climate issues, governments worldwide are implementing strict CO2 emission policies and subsidizing buyers to expedite the transition from ICE cars to electric. Multiple countries have announced various bans on new gasoline vehicles. Norway, for example, stated there will be no sales of gasoline cars by 2025. The Netherlands said all vehicles will be emission-free by 2030 while the United States plans to reduce car emissions to zero by 2050. In order to achieve these ambitious goals countries are heavily subsidizing consumers. The Chinese government has been especially active in encouraging development in the market, hence the visible progress. It has implemented license-plate restriction on gasoline cars in Beijing and, until recently, China incentivized consumers to purchase electric cars by providing credits of up to $7,400. This year China raised its 2025 sales target for EVs from 20% to 25% to spur progress. England is pushing regulation to discourage fossil-fuel car use as well. According to a McKinsey report, local authorities in London are placing $16 daily fees on overly polluting vehicles in “ultra-low-emission zones”. In the U.S., buyers of electric vehicles can get a tax credit from $2,500 to $7,500 when purchasing a new electric car. Buyers in California are eligible for even higher tax credits. Some cities such as San Jose provide extra purchasing subsidies of $2,500 in addition to IRS incentives. Even Ukraine, Europe’s poorest country, offers subsidies by waiving a 20% VAT on all imported electric cars. 

Current challenges: cost, range, infrastructure

As impressive as the progress looks, the global EV market is facing numerous challenges that currently limit the growth of the industry as a whole. The most noticeable issue is the high price of electric vehicles. This year, the average price of an electric car in the U.S. was $55,600, while the average price for a full-size gasoline car in 2018 was $34,925. Hybrid cars were even cheaper with the price hovering around $27,600. There are several reasons why EVs cost more than conventional vehicles. EV producers focus on building luxury models thus driving up the average price. BMW’s cheapest EV model starts at $44,500 while Audi’s SUV starting price is $74,800. In terms of economics, a major price driver is a high vehicle production cost. The battery pack is one of the main contributors to an overall high price. Batteries are expensive to make and the process behind manufacturing cells is incredibly complex. Today, manufacturers use lithium ion batteries in production. According to an Accenture report on the industry, because lithium is a rare metal sensitive to shortages and price shocks it creates certain risks and can cause production issues or delays. Ultimately, the main factor contributing to the high costs of producing batteries and assembling cars is the scale of production. Currently, the industry does not have the demand nor the funds to scale its production. Therefore, consumers assume the burden of cost. In addition to high upfront costs, two other major public concerns slowing down the growth of the industry are the range and availability of infrastructure. The first concern is tied directly into battery production. However, a Deloitte report analyzing the EV industry states that as next-generation electric vehicles are introduced, and the battery technology improves, the “range anxiety” will become obsolete (refer to figure 2 below). According to the U.S. Department of Energy, the median drive range has already increased from 73 miles in 2011 to 125 miles last year.

Figure 2 (graph retrieved from Deloitte)

A far more pressing issue is the charging infrastructure. As of 2019, there were only around 10,000 public charging stations in the United States. Center for American Progress, a public policy research organization dealing with economic and social issues, stated that in order to support an increasing number of EVs in the U.S. the country must dramatically improve its charging infrastructure. It cannot accommodate the increasing demand for electric cars. It is estimated that the U.S. will need to invest around $4.7 billion by 2025 to install 330,000 public charging stations throughout the country. 

How to address the concerns and challenges?

These challenges create substantial barriers for growth, however, there are several developments in the industry that will likely resolve issues with production, infrastructure, and consumer demand. Ultimately, it comes down to reducing costs for manufacturers without sacrificing the quality of production. The key factors are scale, location, and strategic partnerships. EV companies are already scaling up production. For example, Tesla’s Gigafactory is an expansive facility that produces batteries, car components, and solar panels and will eventually begin assembling cars. Furthermore, the company wants the factory to operate entirely on solar energy by installing solar panels on the factory’s roof. Since Tesla started building its first Gigafactory in Nevada, it has already built a second factory in the U.S. and a third in China. Moreover, recent plans were announced to build a Gigafactory in Germany. This will allow the company to minimize car manufacturing and shipping costs while expanding production on three continents. 

Partnering with other EV manufacturers and placing key production in advantageous locations will allow EV companies to reduce risks of battery shortage and decrease cost. NIO outsources its manufacturing and, according to The Verge, was able to start production quicker while its Californian competitors, Faraday Future and Lucid Motors, struggled to build their own factories. General Motors and LG are investing $2.3 billion into a battery plant in Ohio to jointly make batteries for electric cars. Toyota is investing $2 billion in Indonesia to manufacture electric cars. This strategy will place Toyota EV production in a country that is rich in key resources that make up batteries. Since other companies are investing in Indonesia as well, according to Businessinsider, establishing production in Indonesia will allow Toyota to work close to other EV manufacturers and: “lead to supply chain and infrastructure efficiencies that can drive down costs for components, such as batteries.” 

Government incentives will play a big role in helping the EV industry to grow. According to McKinsey, government subsidies and regulations decrease the gap between high costs and consumers’ ability to pay and directly stimulate investments in EV technology. Since 2016 the U.S. Congress has allocated roughly $8.9 billion to EV technologies R&D that includes battery and vehicle tech as well as sustainable transportation development. The funds that the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has been receiving from Congress has aided the development of EV technology. By 2014, DOE has helped cut battery costs by 50% which ultimately cut costs for manufacturers. In California, EV companies get a special incentive. The California Air Resources Board (CARB) enforces a cap-and-trade program to lower emissions in the state. Part of this program requires the automakers in the state to make a certain number of zero-emission vehicles a year. When companies produce more than required, they receive “allowances” which they can sell to automakers that did not meet the requirement. Such a program does two things: it encourages automakers to produce more EVs and generously rewards the EV manufacturers. By 2018, Tesla has sold $1.2 billion worth of “allowances”. Furthermore, the U.S. government aims to subsidize the costs of installing charging infrastructure. According to the Center for American Progress, 17 states have already implemented incentives to develop the infrastructure. These include tax exemptions and direct investments. The industry will, no doubt, require more robust investments and incentives on behalf of governments to develop the infrastructure to an appropriate level. To keep the industry growing it is vital for the world’s governments to directly subsidize costs for both the consumers and companies.

The future is near

Just like many other exciting developments in the modern world, the electric vehicle industry is widely discussed, especially given the climate circumstances all over the world. However, it is important to keep in mind that gasoline cars are still far more prevalent. It is estimated that non-electric passenger vehicles sales in 2018 exceeded 85 million units worldwide while electric vehicles only accounted for 2 million units. This will change, however, within two decades. The sales of EVs are expected to surpass ICEs in 2038. Already ICE auto sales are contracting in China while EV sales are growing and account for half of worldwide sales. China will, in fact, remain the largest market for the EV industry, although its market share will start declining in about 5 years (see figure 3 below). 

Figure 3

Every year the costs are subsiding, the range is increasing, the infrastructure is getting more widespread, therefore drivers are more willing to purchase an electric vehicle. An Accenture global study done in 12 countries involving thousands of people showed that 60% of those who wanted to purchase a car within 10 years will probably consider an electric vehicle. This indicates a shifting mentality among the population and will drive the demand for the EVs. Cost won’t be a major issue within a couple of years. Deloitte estimates that the costs of owning EVs will reach an equilibrium point with the costs of owning ICE cars as early as 2022. McKinsey stated that as battery efficiency and economies of scale improve, we can expect a cost reduction of at least $5,100 per vehicle. As these trends emerge, the EV brands will evolve and compete for supremacy; their ability to overcome previously mentioned challenges by taking advantage of location, partnerships, and scale will determine their fate in the market. The future is not as far as it seems but is much further than we would like it to be. 

Sources:

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-49578790

https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R45747.pdf

https://www.cbinsights.com/research/report/electric-car-race/

https://cars.usnews.com/cars-trucks/cheapest-electric-cars

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/average-car-prices-more-1-110000010.html

https://www.audiusa.com/models/audi-e-tron

https://www.bmwusa.com/vehicles/bmwi/i3/sedan/all-electric.html

https://qz.com/1695602/the-average-electric-vehicle-is-getting-cheaper-in-the-us/

http://www.orocobre.com/news/china-raises-2025-ev-target/

https://www.kyivpost.com/business/ukraine-seeks-boost-electric-car-sales-import-tax-exemption-infographics.html

https://qz.com/1341155/nine-countries-say-they-will-ban-internal-combustion-engines-none-have-a-law-to-do-so/

https://www.energy.gov/eere/electricvehicles/electric-vehicles-tax-credits-and-other-incentives

https://www.industryweek.com/energy/how-california-taught-china-sell-electric-cars

http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article/chinas-ev-market/

https://www.businessinsider.com/toyota-investing-in-electric-vehicles-indonesia-2019-7

https://www.theverge.com/2018/8/19/17692560/nio-ipo-tesla-china-electric-cars-public

https://www.theverge.com/transportation/2018/11/30/18118451/tesla-gigafactory-nevada-video-elon-musk-jobs-model-3

https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/automotive-and-assembly/our-insights/making-electric-vehicles-profitable

http://www.nytimes.com/2019/12/05/business/gm-lg-battery.html

https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/automotive-and-assembly/our-insights/expanding-electric-vehicle-adoption-despite-early-growing-pains

http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/green/reports/2018/07/30/454084/investing-charging-infrastructure-plug-electric-vehicles/

https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/uk/Documents/manufacturing/deloitte-uk-battery-electric-vehicles.pdf

http://www.orocobre.com/news/global-ev-sales-jump-63-percent-in-2018/

https://qz.com/1618775/by-2038-sales-of-electric-cars-to-overtake-fossil-fuel-ones/

http://semiengineering.com/electric-cars-gain-traction-but-challenges-remain/

https://www.eei.org/issuesandpolicy/electrictransportation/Documents/FINAL_EV_Sales_Update_April2019.pdf

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2019-04-16/the-world-s-biggest-electric-vehicle-company-looks-nothing-like-tesla

https://www.cnn.com/interactive/2019/08/business/electric-cars-audi-volkswagen-tesla/

https://edition.cnn.com/2019/05/09/business/volkswagen-id-electric-car-reservation/index.html

https://www.britannica.com/topic/Tesla-Motors

https://www.tesla.com/cybertruck

https://www.theverge.com/2019/2/22/18236707/tesla-model-3-2018-best-selling-ev-global

https://fortune.com/longform/electric-car-auto-industry-china/

https://www.businessinsider.com/volvo-ford-toyota-release-electric-vehicles-to-compete-in-market-2019-10

https://www.autonews.com/sales/toyota-amps-us-ev-plans-join-new-surge

From gasoline to electric

Last week the world saw yet another one of Tesla’s creations, the Cybertruck. This electric pickup truck that looks like a prop from a futuristic science-fiction film can accelerate from 0 to 60 mph in 2.9 seconds and boasts a driving range of up to 500 miles. Besides its peculiar design, it’s hardly a surprise for an electric vehicle to surpass some gasoline cars in performance and price nowadays. That wasn’t the case a couple of decades ago. 

In the early 1900s, the first electrically powered cars gained quite a bit of popularity in the United States, especially in urban settings. However, the popularity was short-lived and as gasoline cars became cheaper the electric vehicle market became extinct and remained that way until the 21stcentury. Although there were several attempts to revive the electric cars market, it wasn’t until 2008 that electric vehicles started gaining a new momentum. Tesla Motors, headed by Elon Musk, has made the necessary leap into the EV market and introduced its first model, the Roadster, that was praised for an unprecedented performance and charge range at the time it was released. With a price tag of over $100,000, it has established itself as a luxury car brand and spurred the automaking competition. Over the years the cars have become cheaper, more convenient, and the infrastructure has begun adapting to satisfy consumer demand however, the infrastructure currently poses barriers for entry in some regions. 

Since Tesla unveiled Roadster the EV industry has grown tremendously. Just in the U.S., the number of electric cars on roads has grown from barely a dozen thousand in 2011 to over 1.1 million cars in 2019. The following chart demonstrates a steady increase in electric cars in the U.S. 

The promising growth of the EV industry and attractive car options have extended the market from the U.S. to an entire world. In fact, the sales of electric cars in the U.S. accounted for only 17% of global EV sales in 2018 with the most lucrative market in China. 

Tesla still leads the industry in terms of sales even outselling established luxury gasoline-powered car brands such as BMW in the United States. However, other brands such as General Motors, Nissan, Ford, Volkswagen, and BMW are not lagging behind in expanding their EV fleet. Volkswagen is spending billions of dollars to reshape its factories for electric car production. The company has already revealed its first electric car model, ID. 3 1ST, which will start deliveries in 2020. It will offer free battery charging for a year and the cost of the vehicle will be less than $45,000. Additionally, according to CNN Business, Volkswagen Group, which owns luxury car brands such as Porsche and Lamborghini, will spend $34 billion over the next half a decade to develop an electric or hybrid model of every car currently in production. Given that Volkswagen and other established brands have an advantage over Tesla in terms of revenue, these companies will put up a significant competition to it.

Although the electric vehicle industry is widely discussed, especially given the climatic circumstances and policies all over the world, gasoline cars are far in advance. It is estimated that non-electric passenger vehicles sales in 2018 exceeded 85 million units worldwide while electric vehicles only sold 2 million units. Furthermore, it is projected that electric passenger cars will outnumber gasoline-powered cars only in 2038. As for now, we can expect significant retrofitting of the automotive industry for the next two decades and predominantly more expensive EV models in the near future. 

Sources:

https://www.cnn.com/interactive/2019/08/business/electric-cars-audi-volkswagen-tesla/

https://edition.cnn.com/2019/05/09/business/volkswagen-id-electric-car-reservation/index.html

https://www.britannica.com/topic/Tesla-Motors

https://www.energy.gov/articles/history-electric-car

https://qz.com/1618775/by-2038-sales-of-electric-cars-to-overtake-fossil-fuel-ones/

https://www.eei.org/issuesandpolicy/electrictransportation/Documents/FINAL_EV_Sales_Update_April2019.pdf

https://www.tesla.com/cybertruck

Wineconomics: Climate Change

One of many chateaus in Bordeaux, France

In 2018, my family and I took a trip to Bordeaux, France, a region that prides itself for world-class wine. We visited multiple chateaus that looked like miniature palaces from the 19thcentury. On the outside, they were extravagant and radiated quite a historic glow. On the inside, they were surprisingly minimalistic: fermenting cylinders, labyrinth cellars, and reception offices. Each chateau representative we have talked to offered a unique insight into why their chateau’s wine is better than the neighbor’s. Organic growing techniques, hand-picked grapes, land, sun, shade, grape mix all play a role in making the best quality wine. Interestingly, it is the land and regional weather patterns that decide who gets to produce the best wine. As I learned during my tour, Petrusis among the top vineyards in Bordeaux with an average price of $2,895 for a bottle of wine. Why? It’s the land. Recently, however, the wine industry, not just in France but all over the world, has been changing due to human-induced climate volatility. Climate change already affects crop yield, geographical preferences, and quality of wine among other things. What does is it mean for the wine industry in economic terms and what does it mean for consumers?

Wine cellar in one of the many chateaus in Bordeaux

When thinking about an economy of a region or a country wine may seem like a miscellaneous factor, yet the world’s elite and wine enthusiasts have turned this alcoholic beverage into a portfolio investment diversification that brings in millions of dollars in profit. Cult Wines, a U.K. wine portfolio manager, in fact, returns 13% on wine investments annually. Wine has become a status symbol and fierce competition between the world’s renown vineries has encouraged an appreciation in value and rapid industry growth. In 2018, the global wine market had a total value of $302 billion and it is expected to rise to $450 billion by 2024. That’s more than 3 times the GDP of Ukraine. In 2016, the California wine industry output was $57.6 billion (2.3% of California’s GDP in 2016). This is not a major economic driver; however, the Californian wine industry is responsible for 786,387 jobs nationwide of which 325,000 are based in California alone.  

The wine industry is a particularly interesting area to investigate under the economic and environmental spotlight because in some cases it defies what one might think of climate change. Regions, that were once unsuitable for producing high-quality wine, such as Mosel and Rhine Valleys in Germany can now make world-class wine. According to research conducted by two professors from Princeton and NYU, in the 3C warming scenario, the value of vineyards in Mosel Valley may double while revenues may rise by 180%. As temperatures rise the northern regions of France and Germany will generally produce higher quality wine which is good news for Bordeaux. Studies show that a 1C increase in temperature leads to a 61.1% increase in price for Grand Cru Bordeaux wines. Sounds like climate change is good news? Not so fast. If the temperatures keep rising California may produce worse quality wine. Additionally, according to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2000) A2 scenario, the total area suitable for growing grapes in the U.S. will shrink from 4.1 million square kilometers to 3.5 million square kilometers by the end of the 21stcentury. Given that the California wine industry is so ubiquitous in the U.S. and employs over 700,000 people nationwide the rising temperatures will pose a significant challenge to Napa vineyards. Changing wildfire patterns will also pose an economic threat to the industry. Fortunately, rising temperatures are a long-term phenomenon that leaves plenty of room for vineyards to adapt by shifting harvest seasons and employing extensive irrigation techniques. 

There are, of course, limitations to the accuracy of economic forecasts, and it is too early to say what the true impact on the industry will be. One thing is certain – Petrus is still going to be expensive and there will be no shortage of fine wine in the near future. 

Sources:

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-07-19/why-the-best-investment-vehicle-is-one-you-can-drink

https://www.mordorintelligence.com/industry-reports/wine-market

https://ideas.repec.org/a/tpr/restat/v92y2010i2p333-349.html

https://academic.oup.com/reep/article/10/1/25/2583835

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/10/14/dining/drinks/climate-change-wine.html

https://winesvinesanalytics.com/features/article/173240/Economic-Impact-of-California-Wine-114Bhttps://scholars.unh.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1419&context=honors

The Interest Rate in Ukraine Pays Close Attention to Economic Indicators

In 2014, Ukraine underwent a revolution ousting a Russian puppet-president which sent the country into complete chaos both economically and politically. Following the revolution Russia annexed Crimea and full-on warfare broke out on the eastern border of Ukraine killing thousands of people. The economy shrank dramatically, prices went up, and given the unstable state of the economy, investments stopped flowing into the country. The interest rates set by the National Bank of Ukraine skyrocketed immediately. This interest rate is what’s called the federal funds rate in the United States. It is the interest rate set by the central bank that tells commercial banks how much interest they should charge when making loans to each other. What can the interest rate tell us about the economy and why should you as a citizen of Ukraine or foreign investor care about it? The answer is simple: what banks charge each other sets the interest rate at which they pay or charge you! The central bank’s interest rate is one of the most important factors that sheds light on the economic indicators reflecting the current and expected economic health of a country.

Take a look at this chart:

Image from tradingeconomics.com

This chart shows the interest rate set by the National Bank of Ukraine in a 10-year period. There are a couple of conclusions we can make from observing the chart. The most noticeable one is that Ukraine’s economy is incredibly unstable. That is true and, in fact, the prime reason for a spike in interest rate starting in 2014 is high inflation.

Now, take a look at the following inflation chart:

At its highest peak, inflation reached more than 60%. In order to offset the increasing inflation, the National Bank of Ukraine set its interest rate at 30% during the same time period. Since then the rate has gradually subsided to 16.5% and inflation went down to 8.8% as of this writing. As soon as the economic indicators started showing signs of recovery: inflation decreased, and GDP increased from $91 billion in 2015 to $130 billion in 2019 it made sense to lower the interest rate. However, the interest rates are still high, especially compared to those of the U.S. which recently lowered its federal funds rate to a target rate of 1.75% – 2%. The underlining explanation might not be obvious but part of the reason for keeping interest rates high is to lure foreign investments to finance the government’s debt and to rebuild Ukraine’s economy amidst the war and political pressure. Here’s what Ukraine’s short-term government bond yield looks like:

Image from www.worldgovernmentbonds.com
Data as of September 23rd, 2019

These percentages are unbelievably high. According to CNBC, the investors’: “holdings of domestic bonds have jumped nearly 10-fold since the start of the year, to 61.6 billion hryvnias ($2.4 billion).” If you are an investor searching for a high yield investment this is the time and place to invest.

Unfortunately, the Ukrainian side of the interest rate story isn’t nearly covered as extensively as the story of the Fed’s rate cut. Nonetheless, it is still worth examining the economic indicators and search for possible connections to the interest rates.

Sources:

https://tradingeconomics.com/ukraine/interest-rate

https://tradingeconomics.com/ukraine/gdp

https://tradingeconomics.com/ukraine/inflation-cpi

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/07/08/reuters-america-poll-analysts-split-on-ukraine-interest-rate-decision-in-july.html

http://www.worldgovernmentbonds.com/country/ukraine/

Black Death: Higher Wages Drive Progress?

Instead of trying to predict the future economic outlook of today, this blog takes on a retrospective stance on European economic growth from the 14th-16th centuries.

In the 1340s Italian ports in Genoa and Venice thrived on trade and commerce. Traders from Asia were a regular sight, bringing spices and other luxury commodities from distant lands. It was a time of relative prosperity; however, within a couple of years, Europe would live through its worst plague epidemic, Black Death, that would ultimately wipe out roughly a third of the European population and change the course of its economy. In less than a decade more than 20 million people perished from the mysterious disease. Yet, amidst the chaos something interesting was brewing – wages started climbing rapidly.

At the time of the feudal system, peasants rarely had any choice and no income mobility. The wages were low, and the cost of capital was high. The Black Death has suddenly swayed the odds in the peasants’ favor. In order to understand how the epidemic affected labor and wages, it’s crucial to understand the supply and demand framework. The supply and demand of labor rest at equilibrium, meaning that if the working population were to suddenly drop, labor would become scarcer and wages would rise, establishing a new equilibrium. As the population rapidly decreased, there were fewer labor units available. It was only logical for peasants to demand higher wages from their lords. Lords, in turn, had no choice but to pay more because the number of fields to plow, remained the same. 


(Image cited from The Economist)

The wages were so high that England passed a law in 1349 forcing peasants to accept wages they received before the plague. As peasants gained more leverage, many lords were forced to give them broader freedoms and better working conditions. This time period of high wages became a milestone that ultimately led to the dissolution of Feudalism altogether in the 16th century.

As the wages spiraled out of control so did the inflation. According to The Economist, within the first 4 years of the epidemic, the average wheat prices rose 300%. Nevertheless, the lords enjoyed higher profits as prices went up and the peasants appreciated higher wages. People in Europe now had more purchasing power and a stronger incentive to maximize the efficiency of production as labor costs piled up.

Although the European economy underwent a post-plague recession it has reemerged as an economic powerhouse a century later. New innovations stemmed from scarce labor, higher wages, and greater purchasing power. Novel double-entry bookkeeping revolutionized accounting processes while banking systems became more complex. The printing press was invented in an effort to balance out the high wages and labor deficit. Technological advancements in shipbuilding allowed for exploration and unprecedented trade growth.

The Black Death was a horrifying time period in Europe which severely damaged the economy. At the same time, its side effects spurred immense growth within the region. Labor scarcity and high wages might have not been the sole ingredients in such a change, but they certainly had encouraged innovation in different practices and altered the societal structure which set Europe on the path of progress.

Sources:

http://msh.councilforeconed.org/documents/978-1-56183-758-8-activity-lesson-15.pdf

https://eh.net/encyclopedia/the-economic-impact-of-the-black-death/

https://theconcourse.deadspin.com/after-the-black-death-europes-economy-surged-1821060986

https://www.economist.com/free-exchange/2013/10/21/plagued-by-dear-labour

https://www.brown.edu/Departments/Italian_Studies/dweb/plague/effects/social.php