Sauna business, hot business

vanha sauna

Many people in the U.S. can say one word of Finnish without knowing it. They can say sauna. Some of them – I believe – even have some kind of an image what sauna is.

Some few have experienced it.
Sauna is an old Finnish word, and it is ancient old tradition in Finland. The word refers to the old way of bathing in this cold country, and it refers to the bathing house – a steam room that is heated up of with a special kind of stove, kiuas.
Ages ago saunas were considered sacred places in Finland. Women gave birth to their children in saunas – as they were not only sacred but also clean and warm places even in the midst of cold winter. There are many superstitions and old rituals related to bathing in sauna.
Still today, saunas are so important to Finns that nearly every apartment building in the country includes a common sauna for its habitants. In addition to that, quite many people have a tiny sauna in their apartment.
Houses are sure to have a sauna room – it would be considered odd if a new house built in Finland did not include a sauna.
In the cities, saunas have electric heating systems but in the countryside and in the leasure homes along the country’s 200,000 lakes, they are still heated up with logs burning in traditional stoves.
For decades, there has been two big sauna equipment producers and stove makers in Finland. These companies are called Harvia and Narvi.
Their owners were, and still are, among the richest people in Finland.

 

harvia

Photo: Harvia sauna

On Wednesday, December 3rd, the main headline in all the news sites of the U.S. was the mass shooting that happened in San Bernandino, California.
The most read story of the site of the main daily newspaper of Finland, Helsingin Sanomat, was about saunas. It was a column of the paper’s correspondent in Britain who wrote about her friend who wanted to have a Finnish sauna in her in her backyard in London.
“Ordering a sauna from Finland was not possible – why don’t Finns want to make money?” This was the headline of her story (roughly translated).
The text itself told that a Finnish-British family who tried to buy a Finnish sauna from Finland to London didn’t even receive an answer to their requests for offers from the Finnish sauna and stove makers.
Instead, a German sauna maker – with no roots in Finnish sauna tradition – answered immediately and finally built the family a Finnish style sauna with an electric heater.

 

Finnish readers were very upset about the story. Not only did it tell that foreigners were selling our tradition but it also told that Finns cannot make money abroad – even in the case when it should be really simple. The country’s economic situation is very worrying. Unemployment is in rise. Trade is slowing down.
And Finns let Germans sell the products that should be our national pride!
I wasn’t surprised to read this sauna story.
In Los Angeles, I met a Finnish film maker who told me what happened when he wanted to build a sauna to his backyard in Hollywood. He is a wanna-be carpenter and did all the wood work himself. He had his sauna in a garden shed, and finally only the heating system was missing. He wanted to buy a Finnish stove. He couln’t get one.
He bought a Swedish electric stove.
What a shame.

 

So what are the Finnish sauna makers doing? I decided to find out.
Money, is the first answer.
The sauna company Harvia’s profit margin has been between 20 to 25 percent every year since 2010. The company started in year 1950 as a small local stove maker and grew until the first years of new millennium.
The owners – a family with name Harvia – then reported that is was the as big as it can get in Finland. The family sold the company to an international investment company, and the company started to grow again.
Its’ net revenue was €40 million in 2010, and €44 million in 2014.

Narvi, the other main sauna brand, is not doing that well. It is a company with good financial standing and high gearing ratio – but for how long?
Last year its net revenue was €6,7 million. The net revenue reduced from the previous year 18 percent. At the same time Narvi made a loss of €282,000, and in 2013 the loss was even bigger: €1,9 million.
In its’ website, Narvi boasts about being “currently the only large producer of sauna heaters in the market, whose entire product range is designed and manufactured exclusively in Finland”.

 

Keeping the production exclusively in Finland is obviously not that good idea.
Harvia, the profit-making sauna maker, has opened factories in China, Russia and Estonia. They have a sales office in Hong Kong.
The CEO of Harvia told a reporter of Helsingin Sanomat this year, that Asians do not yet ask for a Finnish sauna built in their homes. But Harvia is doing business with hotels. If a hotel wants to have five stars, it needs to have a sauna.

Harvia may have a good reason to ignore one or two Finnish expats wanting to buy a Finnish sauna. Harvia is busy in Asia.
But the sauna maker Narvi, who wants to keep its production in Finland… What on earth keeps it from selling its’ products abroad?

When does a tech company cease to be a tech company?

When it’s on its way to no longer being a company, period.

Yahoo CEO Marissa Mayer (from Fortune)

Yahoo CEO Marissa Mayer (from Fortune)

 

Once upon a time, Yahoo was the leader in Internet search, but now as it looks more like roadkill with Google’s and Facebook’s tire tracks over it. As a result, it is considering selling its Internet business, which would make it a…uh…different company.

Two major questions that come to mind are: 1. Why? And 2. What will this new Yahoo be?

The first question has an answer: an activist investor, in this case, New York hedge fund Starboard Value.

Starboard has been a vocal critic of Yahoo CEO Marissa Mayer, believing her tenure has been an abject failure to Yahoo investors, as net revenue has fallen despite industry-wide investment in digital marketing. Consequently, the fund is working to force her to accept defeat at the hands of rivals Facebook and her former employer, Google, and abandon what has been the company’s core business since its inception.

Jeff Smith, Starboard Value (from New York Times)

Jeff Smith, Starboard Value (from New York Times)

 

This Starboard-Mayer situation is certainly not the first time an activist investor and a CEO have gone toe-to-toe on business strategy, but there is frequently some sort of fight. In this case, with three and a half years of declining revenues, Mayer doesn’t really have a leg to stand on.

Further complicating the issue is the alternative to spinning out the Internet business—potentially paying astronomical tax bills in two different countries. Coincidentally, this also begins the discussion of the second (and unanswerable) question of what would become of Yahoo.

Yahoo bought a stake in Chinese e-commerce giant Alibaba for $1 billion in 2005—an outrageous sum of money at that point in time. Arbitrary nature of tech valuations aside, Alibaba went public last year with the largest tech IPO in history. Great news for Yahoo, right?

Wrong.

The stock has basically declined in value over the last year, and while Yahoo is still looking at a stake worth a bunch of money, it’s also looking at giant tax bills from both the U.S. and China if it tries to capitalize on that stake by spinning it out.

Initially, Mayer had thought that she and Yahoo might dodge the U.S. tax, which by some estimates, would total more than half of the value of its stake. Then the company might have to pay Chinese taxes on top of it.

Starboard’s stance is that Yahoo needs to cut its losses and dump its Internet and display ad business, much the way AOL did when it sold to Verizon earlier this year. Its demand letter alluded to a market for the business but didn’t elaborate.

Regardless, though, the consensus among those covering tech seems to be that the clock is ticking on Mayer, and this decision is likely to make or break her tenure.

China: Loss of GDP on Smog

U152P5029T2D548089F24DT20130113084902

Right when the world leaders gather in Paris for the discussion of environmental issues at the Paris Environmental Conference, China is suffering from heavy smog pollution in multiple areas. This extremely painful weather once again calls upon people’s concentration and concern for air pollution problems.

Air pollution problems are more severe than we think. The UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme) has listed air pollution as “world’s worst environmental health risk” in its Year Book 2014 emerging issues update. UNEP analyzed environmental, social and economic costs of air pollution:

“The cost of air pollution to the world’s most advanced economies plus India and China is estimated to be US$3.5 trillion per year in lives lost and ill health. In OECD countries the monetary impact of death and illness due to outdoor air pollution in 2010 is estimated to have been US$1.7 trillion.”

Deaths caused by outdoor air pollution reach a level of 3.5 million each year from. Between 2005 and 2010, the death rate rose by 4% worldwide, by 5% in China and by 12% in India (UNEP Yearbook 2014).

Air pollution not only threatens people’s life and death, it hinders economic growth as well.

In 2010 alone, air pollution caused lost of USD 1.4 trillion in China (OECD). The total cost of health impact of outdoor air pollution in OECD countries is about USD 1.7 trillion in 2010 (OECD). The World Bank estimated there is at least loss of USD 100 billion spent on illness, premature death and loss of productivity, due to smog in China (The Financialist).

Just because air pollution is a critical issue worldwide, leaders are trying to search for solutions. In addition, solving air pollution problems will likely reduce economic losses and stimulate tremendous economic potential.

China could learn from some previous successful examples. In the U.S., the Clean Air Act (CAA) of 1990 aimed at reducing and preventing air pollution. Combating air quality and enforcing emission limitations were major goals of the CAA. The U.S. has seen many pollutant levels and associated cases of health complications drop, after the act took effect. The direct economic benefit generated from the CAA is 90 times the initial fund put into the regulations.

Wealthy Chinese are investing in real estate in foreign countries and immigrating away from Mainland China, due to the deteriorating air conditions in China. Beijing has announced some policies including China’s Action Plan of Prevention and Control of Air Pollution; however, the people of China have seen little improvement, as Chinese economy remains unstable.

The air pollution in China has caused trillions of USD in loss for its GDP, but the problem is far from being solved. On the other hand, when China eventually becomes capable of finding a solution to its smog problem, there might be growth in its economic outlook as well.

 

Sources:

http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/download/9789264210448-sum-en.pdf?expires=1449128721&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=1E9A27001F2B3684A8CD4AB8D5284351

http://www.unep.org/yearbook/2014/PDF/chapt7.pdf

http://www2.epa.gov/clean-air-act-overview/1990-clean-air-act-amendment-summary

https://www.thefinancialist.com/chinese-smog-at-what-cost/

 

Cyber Monday Sales On the Rise as Black Friday Falls Short

Long gone are the days of actually celebrating Thanksgiving day by spending it with family and friends while giving thanks for the things that we already have to fill our lives and homes. Thanksgiving day unofficially marks the start of the holiday shopping season. After the Turkey is carved and our stomachs are full, we can’t resist but to power on our computers or to waddle our way to the mall to score those great Black Friday deals that we have had our eye on all week. However, if Black Friday shopping didn’t satiate our spending fever Cyber Monday is sure to satisfy that final craving.

blackfridaycybermonday

Both Black Friday and Cyber Monday are considered the busiest sales day of the year. The general trend of previous years resulted in Black Friday usually holding the higher sales figure in total revenue generated, but surprisingly Cyber Monday arose as the greater overall contender for 2015.

While Black Friday generated more total revenue, its sales numbers actually fell 10 percent when compared to last year’s. The total revenue for 2014 was $11.6 billion, whereas this year it only generated $10.4 billion. In addition, $2.74 billion of those sales were in online transactions with $905 million in mobile sales through iOS (Apple) and Android devices (PracticalEcommerce.com).

black-friday-2015-sales-deals-store-hours-what-time-do-sales-begin-open-walmart

In regards to Black Friday sales, the Associated Press reported, “Electronic commerce increased by 14.3 percent on Friday compared to last year’s figures.”

Cyber Monday, on the other hand, surpassed the forecasted $3 billion in sales that was predicated for the shopping day. The Adobe Digital Index, which determines its numbers based on collected and anonymous data from 200 million visits to 4,500 retail websites, calculated that Cyber Monday sales generated a total of $3.07 billion, with 26 percent or an estimated $799 million completed through mobile transactions. In total, Cyber Monday sales rose 16 percent when compared to last year’s numbers. Additionally, Adobe Digital Index reported that out-of-stock items broke record levels on Cyber Monday. It is determined that thirteen out of every 100 product views resulted in an out-of-stock message, which is twice the normal rate. (TechCrunch.com).

cyber-monday-woman-shopping

The main take away from these findings? More people are opting to shop online as opposed to traditional stores and sales via mobile devices are on the rise.

Experts believe that online sales will continue to climb this shopping season. Chris Christopher, whom is the director of consumer economics at IHS consulting, has revealed that between the months of November and December of this year there will be an estimated 11.7 percent jump in e-commerce sales, which would total to about $95 billion.

 

 

Sources:

http://www.practicalecommerce.com/articles/94777-Sales-Report-2015-Thanksgiving-Day-Black-Friday-Cyber-Monday

http://techcrunch.com/2015/12/01/cyber-monday-beat-forecasts-with-a-record-3-07-billion-in-sales-26-from-mobile-devices/#.ahdvta:bP2p

http://www.csmonitor.com/Business/2015/1129/Why-did-Black-Friday-sales-suffer-this-year

Food Waste

“One man’s trash is another man’s treasure.” This quote is proven to be true in the case of a Canadian couple, filmmakers Jen Rustemeyer and Grant Baldwin who spent 6 months eating nothing but discarded food out of dumpsters, a decision that they made after seeing the large amount of edible food wasted just because they were not up to the consumers’ standard of being “fresh”.

“We found 18-foot Dumpsters all the time filled with food, and the majority of that was because it was near the date label, but rarely past it,” said Baldwin, who spent 6 months hunting for discarded food inside dumpsters and behind wholesale warehouses. Food waste is a very serious issue in the United States. It is the largest single source of waste in the country, beating out other waste products such as plastic and paper in landfills. According to the US Environmental Protection Agency, more than 20% of what goes into municipal landfills is food, with food waste weighing at a total of 35 million tons in 2012.

Screen Shot 2015-12-02 at 8.32.09 PM

Surprisingly, most of these food waste were thrown out by farmers and warehouses. It turned out that there are specific rules and regulations that are put in place by grocery stores that the farmers have to follow. For instance, after visiting a peach farmer here in California, Rustemeyer and Baldwin found out that the farmer has to throw out between 30 to 70 percent of his peaches because they were rejected by grocery stores due to cosmetic issues such as it not being of a particular size. Supermarkets tell farmers what diameter, length and curvature that their produce has to be before actually accepting them. And what happens if the produces are not up to standard? They become food waste.

Food waste also impacts the economy significantly. The Environmental Protection Agency estimates that the typical American family throws out about $1,600 worth of food each year, in a country where nearly 18 million households struggle to put food on their table. The United Nations estimates that a third of all the food produced in the world is never consumed, making for a total of about 1.3 billion tons of waste a year. According to the Natural Resources Defense Council, in the United States alone, about 40 percent of all food, worth an estimated $165 billion, is wasted. Especially during holiday season, whereby household waste increases by more than 25% between Thanksgiving and New Year’s Day every year.

FoodShift-BART-pie-NRDC

In conclusion, the next time you decided to toss out that bag of mixed greens that has been sitting in your refrigerator just because it looks wilted, think about how you’re negatively contributing to our economy.